Report to the People
5th July 2004

Last Debate Far From the Last Word

Thursday saw the last ever parliamentary debate in MSPs’ temporary home on The Mound.  As we prepared to hand sole occupancy back to our theological landlords in the Kirk, I suppose it was appropriate to ask “why are we here?”.

Why, I asked during the debate on Argyll and Clyde’s under-fire Clinical Strategy, despite all the extra funding which is going into the NHS, are we here talking about threats to services?

As we in Inverclyde know only too well – and as some of my parliamentary colleagues seem to have difficulty grasping – the root of the problem is (the lack of) NHS workforce planning.  I am not about to go over this ground in detail yet again, but it’s clear, even on a skin-deep analysis, that the inability of the NHS to deal with issues such as new working time rules is affecting service provision across the country.

The debate, though, did more than simply revisit the well-worn arguments.  It also attempted to take matters forward.

For my part, I was pleased to announce that two of Inverclyde’s most respected doctors are ready to play their part in helping draw up the credible alternative plans which are vital if we are to make the Health Board think again.  Leading Inverclyde GP and Chair of the Local Health Care Co-operative, Dr Mustafa Kapasi, and senior consultant surgeon and Clinical Director of Surgery at the IRH, J.J. Morrice, have both assured me that they are prepared to stand up and be counted.

But we need more than star players in the team.  We also need a level playing field.

As I made clear to the Minister on Thursday, the Health Board’s proposals are the product of many officials and many months – two luxuries we will have to do without when we draft our alternatives.

I therefore called on the Minister to outline exactly how our efforts will be supported – in terms of time, resources and expertise – and sought an undertaking that equal weight would be given to the Health Board’s plan and any alternative.  Finally, I argued that a consultation process worthy of the name was essential.

The Minister, while not going into specifics, did say that it was important that the process was fair and balanced and I will be making representations to him, asking that he clarify exactly how he intends to ensure that this is the case.

We might be leaving The Mound, but along with our files and phones, this issue will definitely be coming down the road with us to Holyrood.

Back to Current Reports to the People

 

[ HOME ] [ News ] [ Report to the People ] [ Interact ] [ Links ] [ E-Mail ]

[ Copyright ] [ Directgov ] [ Scottish Parliament ]

Previous Page