Report to the People
9th February 2004

Police Accountability

I was pleasantly surprised last Thursday to see Tory MSPs electing to use a bit of their chamber time to put forward for debate some real ideas on an important issue.

Usually, it’s fair to say, debates called by opposition parties generate more heat than light.  Some don’t even concern Scottish Parliament matters.  Others are little more than an extended moan.

But the Tories, to their credit, avoided both these easy options and tabled a motion suggesting how the police could be made more accountable to the communities they serve.

The need for increased accountability is clear – we only have to look at the row over the dispersal powers in the Antisocial Behaviour Bill to see that.

On the one hand, we had communities driven to distraction by gangs of yobs, hanging about drinking, vandalising, fighting, intimidating and all the rest.  Local police wanted to offer the besieged residents some help, but said they didn’t have the power.  On the other hand, senior police officers told MSPs either that there wasn’t a problem or, if there was, they had sufficient powers to deal with it.

To help pass the feelings of communities and officers on the ground up through the ranks, Thursday’s motion argued, Conveners of Police Boards should be directly elected and localised crime statistics should be made available.

As members of Police Authorities and Police Boards in Scotland are, by virtue of the fact that they are all local Councillors, already elected by their communities,  I wonder if simply changing how the chairman is elected would make the board more responsive or accountable.

Then again, would a figurehead – whose future hung solely on whether crime rose or fell – be more determined to drive through improvements?  Or would they find it hard, when in charge of a force the size of Strathclyde, to reflect adequately the views of communities as diverse as Greenock and Oban?

Publishing localised crime statistics is another interesting idea.  Such information would certainly help us target resources on areas which have particular crime problems.  And, given that the fear of crime is as detrimental to our quality of life as crime itself, properly collated local crime figures could reassure communities.

But, someone will have to prepare and disseminate these reports.  And, like most people, I want to see the Police freed up to police, not ham-strung with more red-tape.

These solutions may not necessarily be right, but it is essential that such ideas are seriously debated if we are to match the expectation of our communities with the operational requirements of our police.

Back to Current Reports to the People

 

[ HOME ] [ News ] [ Report to the People ] [ Interact ] [ Links ] [ E-Mail ]

[ Copyright ] [ UK Online ] [ Scottish Parliament ]

Previous Page