Report to the People
28th May 2007

Energetic Debate

Like running water, mobile phones and English football fans falling out with the police in Europe, electricity is something which today we take for granted.

Not for us getting up at 4 in the morning to set the fire, just to get a cup of tea at breakfast.  We don’t burn gas lamps or spend all day washing clothes by hand.  We just flick switches, turn dials and push buttons.

But just because electricity has always been there, ready to do our bidding, doesn’t mean it always will be.  Indeed, as experts at the Royal Society of Edinburgh pointed out last week, unless key energy policy decisions are taken shortly, we risk power shortages in years ahead.

Renewing generation infrastructure takes time.  We can’t have our existing power stations coming to the end of their lives while their replacements are still being built.

We need, of course, to look at using less energy and at harnessing Scotland’s natural resources.  Not only is this environmentally friendly, constructing wind turbines could keep shipyards like Ferguson’s in work.

But where will the remaining base-load supply will come from?  When fossil fuel power stations produce 18 million tonnes of CO2 in Scotland every year and when there are questions about the security of oil and gas supplies, I would argue that it’s foolish to dismiss nuclear power out of hand.

The new Scottish Executive Ministers might not agree with me.  But, if so, they need to come up with a serious alternative.  They can’t leave us in the dark.

Back to Current Reports to the People

  

[ HOME ] [ News ] [ Report to the People ] [ Interact ] [ Links ] [ E-Mail ]

[ Copyright ] [ Directgov ] [ Scottish Parliament ]

Previous Page