Report to the People
27th October 2003

Way Forward on Maternity

By ducking every one of the big issues, Argyll and Clyde’s short-sighted maternity plan does not offer real solutions, but simply stores up more problems for the future.  Last week’s news that it is to be implemented, then, was both disappointing and infuriating.

I’m not going to rehearse the arguments again.  By now you probably know them about as well as I do.

The question now is: “where do we go from here?”.

Well, if it’s up to the Health Board, we’ll be going to Paisley.  (Although how this squares with the Minister’s commitment that women who choose to give birth in the world class facilities at Glasgow will still be able to do so, I’m not sure.)

That being said, we might not be going there for long.  How many expectant mums requiring consultant-led care are going to travel to Paisley, when there’s a university-led service a few miles up the road in Glasgow?  It is only a matter of time, with fewer and fewer mothers choosing to use it, before the Paisley service is closed.

Also, we cannot lose sight of the serious challenges facing the NHS which have been uncovered by this campaign.

As I mentioned in this column a couple of weeks ago, it is thanks in no small measure to the work which has been done for the Rankin that NHS service planning and the recruitment, training and retention of staff are finally on the political agenda.

Indeed, the Scottish Parliament’s Health Committee is now looking at holding an inquiry into these fundamental issues.  And, it might be said, with similar uproar in Glasgow, Stirling, Perth, Falkirk and elsewhere because of service reviews, about time.

In the coming weeks, I will be arguing that this inquiry’s remit is wide enough to allow a proper examination both of how these problems are arising and how they can be addressed.  Also, given the role played by powerful specialist interests in the maternity review – including the intense pressure piled on the Minister in the final days – I believe we must ask questions about who exactly is running the NHS.

Ministers and the others involved in delivering our much valued health service must accept that it cannot be managed on the basis of stumbling from one crisis to the next.  Services must be planned sensibly and strategically.

In a country as small as Scotland, is that really beyond the bounds of possibility?

Back to Current Reports to the People

 

[ HOME ] [ News ] [ Report to the People ] [ Interact ] [ Links ] [ E-Mail ]

[ Copyright ] [ UK Online ] [ Scottish Parliament ]

Previous Page