Press Release
11th
August 2003

McNeil Demands Truth on Cross-Boundary Co-operation
MSP for Greenock & Inverclyde, Duncan McNeil, today described his shock over claims that NHS obstinacy has led to the “ludicrous anomaly” of two neighbouring Health Boards proposing to site two hospitals providing the same services side-by-side.

He has written to two of Scotland’s top health bosses – the Chief Executives of Greater Glasgow and Argyll & Clyde NHS Boards – demanding to be told the truth over reports that a proposal from Argyll and Clyde to Greater Glasgow to discuss the possibility of joint working was rebuffed.

Currently, Argyll and Clyde NHS Board wishes to centralise all consultant-led inpatient services at the Royal Alexandria Hospital in Paisley.  Greater Glasgow NHS Board is carrying out a similar exercise at the Southern General in Glasgow – seven miles from Paisley’s RAH.

“If this is true, I am absolutely shocked,” Mr McNeil said today.  “I’m no fan of NHS bureaucracy, but even I honestly can’t believe two neighbouring Boards would actually refuse the chance to work together in the interests of their patients.

“I have therefore written to the Chief Executives of the Boards concerned, asking that they confirm whether these reports are correct.”

He continued:

“As a result of the plans which are currently on the table, we are now faced with the ludicrous prospect of two hospitals sited just seven miles apart, serving some 800,000 women and children.  

“Would B&Q or IKEA open two massive stores right next to each other?  Would we build two new police stations, airports or anything else for that matter cheek by jowl?

“So why on earth does anyone think it is acceptable in the NHS?“

In his letter, Mr McNeil says:

“That NHS Argyll and Clyde would opt to centralise a service in a hospital which is on the periphery of its area is surprising in itself.  But when its neighbouring Health Board, Greater Glasgow, is reported to be planning to consolidate the same services in a hospital a mere seven miles away, it seems simply illogical.

“This anomaly has raised questions over why, when two neighbouring Boards were carrying out similar reviews, neither appears to have given significant consideration to the other’s plans.  Indeed, in Argyll and Clyde’s 50,000 word proposal for the future of maternity services, only just over one hundred refer to the Greater Glasgow review.  I am deeply concerned at this apparent lack of cross-boundary co-operation and, having made some initial enquiries on my constituents’ behalf, am advised that approaches made by Argyll and Clyde to Greater Glasgow to discuss the possibility of joint working were rebuffed.”
ENDS

Back to Current Press Releases

 

[ HOME ] [ News ] [ Report to the People ] [ Interact ] [ Links ] [ E-Mail ]

[ Copyright ] [ UK Online ] [ Scottish Parliament ]

Previous Page