Press Release
13th
January 2004

Think Again – HM Inspectorate’s Damning Verdict on Inverclyde’s “Unsatisfactory” School Buildings Crisis
Inverclyde Council’s under-fire Liberal Democrat leadership must urgently rethink their “unsatisfactory” schools policy, says the HM Inspectorate of Education.  

Published today, the scathing report:

MSP for Greenock and Inverclyde, Duncan McNeil, said he was shocked at the report.

“You couldn’t make this up.  A council which has decaying, damp and frankly disgraceful school buildings, scraps an £80 million modernisation and rebuilding programme without having the first idea about what to put in its place.

“If it wasn’t in an independent report from HM Inspectorate, you wouldn’t believe it.”

He continued:

“Since the summer, I have been one of many who was predicting that this would be a disaster.

“It gives me no satisfaction, but the Inspectorate spells it out in black and white – it has come to pass.  We’ve gone past the prediction stage.  This report makes it clear that today, tomorrow, the next day and the day after that, the policies of Inverclyde Council will damage our kids’ education.

The previous Labour administration had plans which the independent inspectors say were ‘ambitious’ and ‘well-founded.’  Plans which ‘addressed value for money issues.’  Plans which would have provided ‘children and pupils in Inverclyde with high quality buildings in which to learn.’  Plans which would ‘have resulted, over time, in every pupil being educated in either a new or a refurbished school building.’

“That the Liberals simply tore these plans up with no thought to the future is nothing short of scandalous and will be acutely embarrassing to the Liberal Democrats in the Scottish Parliament – especially the Deputy Education Minister.  He, after all, is committed to delivering the Partnership Agreement promise to ‘develop the largest ever school building programme in Scotland’s history.’  How much longer will he tolerate his own party colleagues obstructing this policy?

“This amateurish vandalism of our education system cannot go on and I will be making representations to the Minister, asking how the Executive proposes to respond to this scathing report.”

The independent inspectors condemn the Liberals’ decision, when they took control of the Council from Labour last May, to scrap the “ambitious, but well-founded” £80 million school building and modernisation programme, saying “the new administration’s decision to revoke the plans and the inevitable delays” has “resulted in an unsatisfactory situation.”

The Council must, the inspectors say, “act quickly to reconsider the options open to them” as local pupils’ education is already suffering.

The report also questions whether the council could actually fund any future plan, raising doubts “over the feasibility of the Council’s preferred funding options”. 

Despite the failure of the political leadership of the Council, however, education professionals and officials in Inverclyde continue to do a first class job.  The Director of Education and his officials are highly praised for their drive to improve standards.  Attainment, the report highlights at length, has continued to improve since 2001.  “Very good progress” has been made in serving pupils with special educational needs.  And work to promote enterprise, citizenship and links with local industry is welcomed.

But, “in contrast” to these “positive and successful initiatives … and despite the best endeavours of the Director of Education Services and his staff, there had been major weaknesses in the Council’s attempts to improve school buildings”.

This, say the inspectors, is already having an effect.  “The lack of progress continued to impact on pupils’ experiences and prevented effective use of the resources available to improve them,” they state.

The local authority’s lack of any coherent or feasible alternative plan is also criticised.  “The new administration, elected in May 2003, reversed the decision to proceed with the plan, but did not offer an alternative,” notes the Inspectorate.  This caused “a significant number of individuals and representatives of key stakeholder groups” to express concerns over “the lack of a clearly articulated alternative plan.”

The report also reveals that many of those interviewed by the inspection team said the Council’s actions had hit staff morale.  While officers were working to raise it, they had not been entirely successful.
ENDS

Back to Current Press Releases

 

[ HOME ] [ News ] [ Report to the People ] [ Interact ] [ Links ] [ E-Mail ]

[ Copyright ] [ UK Online ] [ Scottish Parliament ]

Previous Page